1%3A21-cv-03027 - Cyph Inc v. Zoom Video Communications IncReport Error
Detail
Case Number
1:21-cv-03027Current Status
closedCause of Action
Patent Infringement
Related Case(s)
N/ACourt
Colorado District CourtPlaintiff(s)
Cyph Inc
Operating CompanyDefendant(s)
Zoom Video Communications Inc
Judge
Raymond P. MooreFiling Date
2021-11-09Termination Date
2022-01-27Dockets
Text |
---|
Final Civil Docket 01-27-2022 |
Initial Civil Docket 11-09-2021 |
ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: David E. Moore. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (jcharl, ) (Entered: 11/10/2021) |
Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) (Entered: 11/10/2021) |
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/10/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) (Entered: 11/10/2021) |
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore`s Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/10/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) (Entered: 11/10/2021) |
MEMORANDUM regarding 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re 1 Complaint, filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/24/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) (Entered: 11/24/2021) |
ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re 11 Notice of Entry of Appearance filed by attorney Carl I. Brundidge. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. *** The filer is missing an electronic s/signature. Please include to all future documents. *** (Text Only Entry) (sdunb, ) (Entered: 11/30/2021) |
MEMORANDUM regarding 23 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/11/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) (Entered: 01/11/2022) |
Interdistrict Transmittal of Documents via e-mail to United States District Court for the Northern District of California ecfhelpdesk@cand.uscourts.gov. Text Only Entry. (sdunb, ) (Entered: 01/27/2022) |
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8169740)Attorney David Evan Moore added to party Cyph, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Cyph, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Moore, David) (Entered: 11/09/2021) |
SUMMONS REQUEST as to Zoom Communications, Inc. by Plaintiff Cyph, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, David) (Entered: 11/09/2021) |
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jcharl, ) (Entered: 11/10/2021) |
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re 1 Complaint, by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 11/23/2021) |
MOTION to Change Venue by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Raghu Rao, # 2 Declaration of Andrew Jones, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit H)(Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 12/09/2021) |
MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Andrew Jones, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 12/27/2021) |
BRIEF in Opposition to 18 MOTION to Change Venue filed by Plaintiff Cyph, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6)(Brundidge, Carl) (Entered: 12/27/2021) |
REPLY to Response to 18 MOTION to Change Venue filed by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Andrew T. Jones, # 2 Exhibit A)(Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 01/10/2022) |
BRIEF in Support of Proposed Protective Order by Plaintiff Cyph, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Plaintiff`s Proposed Protective Order)(Brundidge, Carl) Modified on 1/11/2022 to remove gavel and correct title (sdunb, ). (Entered: 01/10/2022) |
MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Document Defendant`s Proposed Protective Order, # 2 Appendix A, Disputed Protective Order, # 3 Appendix B, Identification of Disputed Provisions)(Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 01/10/2022) |
BRIEF in Opposition to 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Cyph, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Carl Brundidge, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3a, # 5 Exhibit 3b, # 6 Exhibit 4a, # 7 Exhibit 4b, # 8 Exhibit 4c, # 9 Exhibit 4d, # 10 Exhibit 4e, # 11 Exhibit 5, # 12 Exhibit 6)(Moore, David) (Entered: 01/18/2022) |
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Moore, David) (Entered: 11/09/2021) |
Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (jcharl, ) (Entered: 11/10/2021) |
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on November 12, 2021. Pursuant to the Order of Reference, this Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on January 19, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. It is further ORDERED that counsel for the parties and any unrepresented non-prisoner parties in this case are to hold a meeting in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before January 5, 2021 and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), only requests pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 may be submitted before the Rule 26(f) meeting, unless otherwise ordered or directed by the Court. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(A), responses to such discovery requests must be submitted no later than 30 days after the Rule 26(f) meeting, unless the parties stipulate or the Court orders otherwise. (csarr, ) (Entered: 11/12/2021) |
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Carl Irwin Brundidge on behalf of Cyph, Inc.Attorney Carl Irwin Brundidge added to party Cyph, Inc.(pty:pla) (Brundidge, Carl) (Entered: 11/16/2021) |
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Timothy C. Saulsbury on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.Attorney Timothy C. Saulsbury added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 11/23/2021) |
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew T. Jones on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.Attorney Andrew T. Jones added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Jones, Andrew) (Entered: 11/23/2021) |
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/24/2021. For good cause shown, the parties` Joint Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint 14 is granted. Defendant shall file its answer or other response to the operative pleading on or before December 27, 2021.(cpomm, ) (Entered: 11/24/2021) |
Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 01/11/2022) |
BRIEF re 25 Proposed Scheduling Order / Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.`s Brief in support of its Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Saulsbury, Timothy) (Entered: 01/12/2022) |
BRIEF re 25 Proposed Scheduling Order In Support of Plaintiff`s Proposals by Plaintiff Cyph, Inc.. (Brundidge, Carl) (Entered: 01/12/2022) |
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Eric P. Berger by Eric Paul Berger on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.Attorney Eric Paul Berger added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Berger, Eric) (Entered: 01/18/2022) |
COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 1/19/2022. 23 Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED. FTR: A501. (cthom, ) (Entered: 01/19/2022) |
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 19 January 2022. (cmadr, ) (Entered: 01/19/2022) |
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Transfer Venue. That, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a), this action shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 01/27/2022.(sdunb, ) (Entered: 01/27/2022) |
Timeline
filed_date
closed_date
Nov
Dec
2022
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2023
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2024
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Patents In Case